Jump to content

Conservatism: Difference between revisions

1 byte removed ,  22 June 2019
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
The majority of the server's active staff team also follows the policies outlined above. They don't wish to let one side start dominating the other; which could lead to loss of players on both sides. The main two advocates of this policy in the staff team are [[Godsdead]] and [[Maximus_Terragon]] (Maxy) - who have recently rewritten the rules page to provide greater transparency to players on the server rules.
The majority of the server's active staff team also follows the policies outlined above. They don't wish to let one side start dominating the other; which could lead to loss of players on both sides. The main two advocates of this policy in the staff team are [[Godsdead]] and [[Maximus_Terragon]] (Maxy) - who have recently rewritten the rules page to provide greater transparency to players on the server rules.


== Criticisms ===
== Criticisms ==
The problem with trying to satisfy both sides is that the extremes of the two sides are not satisfied. In gaining support of players that are more pvp-focused as well as less pvp-focused, you lose the support of players who want a strongly pvp-focused ([[Anarchism]])or strongly anti pvp-focused ([[Passivism]]) server. This has lead to big disagreements between some veteran players who believe in the more extreme end of the spectrum, and subsequently to damaging of relations and bans/server quits.
The problem with trying to satisfy both sides is that the extremes of the two sides are not satisfied. In gaining support of players that are more pvp-focused as well as less pvp-focused, you lose the support of players who want a strongly pvp-focused ([[Anarchism]])or strongly anti pvp-focused ([[Passivism]]) server. This has lead to big disagreements between some veteran players who believe in the more extreme end of the spectrum, and subsequently to damaging of relations and bans/server quits.