542
edits
Cysteenism: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
The main crew associated with this movement is [[The Asylum]] (TAS), which contains most of the server's veterans from the 2014-16 era who are not too mad about pvp, but wish to keep the server a toxic-free and friendly environment. [[Cysteen]] has long been the main advocate for this, and several of her suggestions have been acted on by staff in order to curb levels of toxicity. | The main crew associated with this movement is [[The Asylum]] (TAS), which contains most of the server's veterans from the 2014-16 era who are not too mad about pvp, but wish to keep the server a toxic-free and friendly environment. [[Cysteen]] has long been the main advocate for this, and several of her suggestions have been acted on by staff in order to curb levels of toxicity. | ||
Along with [[Conservatism]], [[Cysteenism]] lies more or less in the middle of the pvp/no-pvp spectrum, | Along with [[Conservatism]], [[Cysteenism]] lies more or less in the middle of the pvp/no-pvp spectrum, only advocating for improved moderation of toxicity, language, and attitude as a whole, as opposed to changes in levels of pvp. | ||
== Example Policies == | == Example Policies == | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Many members in TAS feel that the server has become a bit too lax on the attitudes of these players, many of them being physically older players above the ages of 18, and disliking the immature and rude attitudes of some of the younger players. Several other players spread across crews share this opinion, such as leaders from SPQR and BE. | Many members in TAS feel that the server has become a bit too lax on the attitudes of these players, many of them being physically older players above the ages of 18, and disliking the immature and rude attitudes of some of the younger players. Several other players spread across crews share this opinion, such as leaders from SPQR and BE. | ||
== Criticisms == | == Criticisms == | ||
| Line 53: | Line 51: | ||
The other big criticism comes from the other side of the spectrum; those who believe Cysteenism policies aren't tackling the problem at its roots; namely too much freedom when it comes to pvp. A lot of drama and all these issues could be prevented by introducing new rules or disabling certain aspects and freedoms of pvp, essentially removing the 'toxic' players from PMC altogether. | The other big criticism comes from the other side of the spectrum; those who believe Cysteenism policies aren't tackling the problem at its roots; namely too much freedom when it comes to pvp. A lot of drama and all these issues could be prevented by introducing new rules or disabling certain aspects and freedoms of pvp, essentially removing the 'toxic' players from PMC altogether. | ||
People who associate themselves with Cysteenism are generally unpopular with the pro-pvp group. A big reason behind this is that they feel that Cysteenism is not a centrist/neutral viewpoint, and instead aiming to reduce the number of pvpers - thus being an anti-pvp movement. | |||